Comments on: The lone semicolon http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/ Dynamics Ax stuff Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:01:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: mfp http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/comment-page-1/#comment-7662 mfp Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:30:14 +0000 http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/#comment-7662 Please see my post on this topic. The compiler in AX6 is now smarter, and the lone (or dangling) semicolon in no longer required. http://blogs.msdn.com/mfp/archive/2008/04/24/what-s-up-with-this-semicolon.aspx Please see my post on this topic. The compiler in AX6 is now smarter, and the lone (or dangling) semicolon in no longer required.

http://blogs.msdn.com/mfp/archive/2008/04/24/what-s-up-with-this-semicolon.aspx

]]> By: Tobias http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/comment-page-1/#comment-3587 Tobias Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:34:04 +0000 http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/#comment-3587 http://blogs.msdn.com/mfp/archive/2008/04/24/what-s-up-with-this-semicolon.aspx :-D http://blogs.msdn.com/mfp/archive/2008/04/24/what-s-up-with-this-semicolon.aspx

:-D

]]> By: Dynamics AXBR » Blog Archive » O solitário ponto e virgula ; http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/comment-page-1/#comment-52 Dynamics AXBR » Blog Archive » O solitário ponto e virgula ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:49:45 +0000 http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/#comment-52 [...] Texto retirado de: http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/ [...] [...] Texto retirado de: http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/ [...]

]]> By: Björn http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Björn Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:36:51 +0000 http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/#comment-23 You're right. Things like this are annoying and reflect poorly on the product. It creates an impression of low quality. Technical folks tend to be very critical of legacy/3rd party code, so we wonder how on Earth they could release that pile of ... :) But to be honest, I think MBS is doing genuine efforts to improve the quality of the code and adhere to their own rules. I remember Axapta 2.5 that came with compilation errors out of the box and had thousands of Best Practice errors. At least standard 4.0 compiles cleanly by now. There's still a long way to go though. You’re right. Things like this are annoying and reflect poorly on the product. It creates an impression of low quality. Technical folks tend to be very critical of legacy/3rd party code, so we wonder how on Earth they could release that pile of … :)

But to be honest, I think MBS is doing genuine efforts to improve the quality of the code and adhere to their own rules. I remember Axapta 2.5 that came with compilation errors out of the box and had thousands of Best Practice errors. At least standard 4.0 compiles cleanly by now. There’s still a long way to go though.

]]> By: Raza http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Raza Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:54:41 +0000 http://sysdictcoder.com/blog/the-lone-semicolon/#comment-22 Yes, Axapta is littered with such bugs and newbies are left wondering how this product made it out of Redmond. Anyway, we get used to it and hope and pray that the next release has better code and overall standards' conformation. Yes, Axapta is littered with such bugs and newbies are left wondering how this product made it out of Redmond. Anyway, we get used to it and hope and pray that the next release has better code and overall standards’ conformation.

]]>